The academic senate of the University of Southern California made a big move on Wednesday by voting to censure both Carol Folt, the university’s president, and Andrew T. Guzman, the provost. This decision follows a series of controversies, including the cancellation of a Muslim student’s valedictory address, the quick removal of a protest camp, and the involvement of police in arresting protesters last month.
While the vote was not a complete representation of the university’s faculty, it did reflect widespread dissatisfaction among them. The senate also called for an investigation into the administration’s actions. Notably, they did not go as far as issuing a vote of no-confidence, which would have been a harsher judgment. Despite criticism, Dr. Folt still has support from some trustees and faculty members.
However, the vote carries significance, indicating serious concerns about the administration’s decision-making. According to William G. Tierney, a professor emeritus at U.S.C., the faculty’s petition and discussion were thoughtful and warranted.
Christina Dunbar-Hester, representing the university’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors, expressed frustration over the lack of communication from administrators and questioned the swift involvement of the Los Angeles Police Department.
The recent events have drawn negative attention to the university, which had hoped for a fresh start with Dr. Folt’s appointment in 2019. Many officials understand the challenges she faces, particularly in managing protests, but the cancellations of ceremonies and heightened security have upset many students and parents.
In response to the censure, Dr. Folt expressed a willingness to work with faculty and engage with a task force investigating the decisions made by the administration. She acknowledged the differing viewpoints within the Trojan Community and emphasized celebrating the Class of 2024 amidst the disruptions.
